![]() |
Quote:
|
I hate Keymod. I had one and I hated it. But that's me. Maybe I'm old school and like a DD rail.
|
Quote:
|
Sigh, I feel like you're not completely reading the entirety of my posts.
I have access to a 5-axis CNC milling machine that I can use to machine my own handguard. I will tell you right now, there's no handguard manufacturing company in the world that will sell you blanks, so I'd have to make my own from billet. I don't care if yours is real steel. That's good! That means the probability they QC'd it is high! However, I'm pointing out that by virtue of it's design, Keymod does have failure points and QC for Keymod will be a little more difficult than M-Lok. The rails used in USSOCOM's testing were real steel; the Keymod still fractured while the M-Lok remained intact. I don't know what you're arguing; we have quantifiable proof from USSOCOM testing that M-Lok is superior... I'm also not getting your last point at all... If you want a real M-Lok rail, you buy a real M-Lok rail. If you don't care, you either keep the airsoft one that came with the gun or you buy an ACM clone. Same thing with Keymod and any other rail system. Everybody's been doing that ever since airsoft started... |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
There is no denying that M-Lok mount system: -is cheaper and simpler to manufacture -is a stronger accessory mount -is more versatile in that accessories can be mounted in both forward or backward orientations -does not by design compromise handguard integrity to the same degree because the slots are not so close together that they act as a perforated line |
Quote:
|
It doesn't matter how well M-Lok performs in the military. Your guns are just toy pot metal plastic bb shooters. Picatinny, M-Lok and KeyMod will all work for our toy guns.
Yesterday, Picatinny was as standard, for awhile KeyMod took a spotlight, and now Magpul is doing everything to ensure M-Lok is the standard. In the future a new rail system will blow M-Lok off the face of the earth. |
I think it's important to note that since China loves to use crappy, less durable materials, having a standard that just had more raw material available is going to be better.
Keymod had breakages in the study which, when you think about the amount of material available, isn't surprising. MLOK accessories mostly just displaced (slid, but stayed attached) in the slot whereas Keymod blew up. And this is on real steel, quality rails... Not China pot metal. Once you add in Pot metal I think its safe to say it's gonna be bad memes I'm not a Material Sciences student or anything but just looking at why Keymod failed in testings, and why MLOK didn't, it's pretty obvious and consistent if you employ common sense. More available material is better. It's a shame Keymod didn't experience some good benefit from being the one that requires much more precise machining to manufacture. |
I think some people are just butthurt they spent money on keymod and its clearly inferior and ugly looking
|
Quote:
|
Not that it's relevant for this but Neither MLOK or keymod have return to zero. It why you see 1913 rail at the very front of some handguards.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.