|
|
|
January 23rd, 2009, 21:57
|
#31 | |
 E-01
|
Quote:
It was also well earned, and probably one of the nicer ones. As for professionalism, everyone on staff volunteers their time and effort; the site is available to all, free of charge, and no one is forcing anyone to be here if they don't like it. There's tons of other airsoft forums around.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
January 24th, 2009, 14:08
|
#32 |
|
well i think if there are some people that are old enough,should have a chance to reverify themself and not be totally banned.i don't think it would be fiar to the ones that are old enough to be totally banned,they should be reverified is.
|
|
|
|
|
January 24th, 2009, 14:10
|
#33 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 24th, 2009, 14:46
|
#34 |
|
Le Roi des poissons d'avril
|
Just so we are clear, I do not have special moderator power or anything. I'm just an ASC emissary. I'm not part of the staff.
So I can't brand people with special names or atributes.
__________________
 Vérificateur d'âge: Terrebonne |
|
|
|
|
January 24th, 2009, 14:52
|
#35 |
|
Traveling Man
|
If you are referring to the "banned from the classifieds" or "no longer an age verifier" titles. Those are a part of the public information service provided. Considering if someone does not look frequently at the tags, they may forget that said person is no longer age verified or a verifier and enter into negoriations that are against forum rules unknowingly.
Don't like it, meh its not your house you are trying to keep clean. As for second chances, some people have been given second chances more then once and blown it. Unfortunately when this happens as much as it has then those people ruin second chances for everyone else. This is the same everywhere, not just on the internet but in real life.
__________________
Saskatchewan Age Verifier! Contact for more Info. 
|
|
|
|
|
January 24th, 2009, 14:56
|
#36 |
|
I think he means Ronan's "crybaby" tag.
|
|
|
|
|
January 24th, 2009, 17:50
|
#37 |
|
Traveling Man
|
Well some of them are just down right suitable and may not make sense to the general public.
__________________
Saskatchewan Age Verifier! Contact for more Info.
|
|
|
|
|
January 24th, 2009, 18:16
|
#38 | |
|
E-01
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 5th, 2009, 03:40
|
#39 | |
|
GabeGuitarded
|
I think what Shadow should have done if he wanted to rejoin the community would have been to send one of the mods an email asking for permission to do so, rather than shadily making an account and getting re-verified. That's personally what I would have done if that were my situation. An apology in the email would probably have been good too.
However, the correct way to deal with that kind of a situation is not really discussed much on the forum, and left mostly to the user's own deduction. A stickied thread on what to do if you have been removed for whatever reason and want a second chance could be a good idea (this is a suggestion, not a criticism). On the other hand, if step-by-step instructions to rejoin ASC after removal were so readily available, a user could feign solemnity just to get access to the classifieds (or whatever they want) again. I didn't really think ahead, and I am left with nothing to conclude this post with... I guess just be open, honest, and respectful to everyone at all times? Anyways let's let this thread die, this thing is pretty much done.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
