TM AUG High Cycle

[Matula]

Originally Posted by Long_Bong

Wonder if the old mags will support the high rof

La seule chose que les gens ont vu sur airsoft France c'est quelques miss feed et un ration plus de l'ordre de 18/20 bb sec avec les mag standard et non 25/30 bb sec. Mais je te rassure, quand tu vois les vidéos, je crois pas que ça change beaucoup

[Styrak]

Originally Posted by Long_Bong

Wonder if the old mags will support the high rof

The 80 round low/mids will probably support almost any rate of fire setup you could have.

[Kos-Mos]

Originally Posted by Styrak

Looks like a standard AUG mag to me. Also TM would be retarded to not make it compatible, and there's no reason not to.
Also the reason it's "high cycle" isn't just gears and motor, it only shoots 250fps.

EDIT: Yup confirmed it's standard AUG mags.

I don't know... the review (with pictures) I read mentioned a different rear outer barrel and hop-up unit, along with a longer nozzle, and the feed hole in the mag was on the very front edge, barely the thickness of the plastic wall...

[Styrak]

Looks the same to me



TM High cycle hicap



CA hicap:



TM hicap:



TM 80 round:

[Jimski]

high cycle would only need a different spring I think

[Styrak]

Originally Posted by Jimski

high cycle would only need a different spring I think

Different motor, highspeed gears, possibly lower power spring.
That's already been established though.

[Long_Bong]

So putting a 350 spring would remove the high rof, unless going with a 9.6v i imagine

[Styrak]

Originally Posted by Long_Bong

So putting a 350 spring would remove the high rof, unless going with a 9.6v i imagine

Yes, it's not some sort of TM magic. It's just physics.

[Jimski]

Originally Posted by Styrak

Different motor, highspeed gears, possibly lower power spring.
That's already been established though.

no I was talking about the spring in the magazine, nevermind lol

[Matula]

Tu vas détruire surtout ta gearbox. La majorité des pieces TM sont en plastique sauf les gear, l'anti reverse, et le spring.

You should keep it at 260fps, the fps doesn't matter anyway. It's a TM

Originally Posted by Long_Bong

So putting a 350 spring would remove the high rof, unless going with a 9.6v i imagine

[Long_Bong]

True!!

[Matula]

Pour les performances (From airsoft France)

La taille du canon il faudrait que tu prennes contact avec tokyo marui pour savoir pourquoi ils ont pas mis un 36cm. rolleyes.gif
La portée efficace est de 40m, l'ajout d'un canon PDI 6.01 de 30.3cm Ã* fait monté la vélocité Ã* 300/305fps et 5m de plus sur la porté.

[Long_Bong]

Nice!!!

[Long_Bong]

Wonder if you can fit Phantom kit and the like

[lord_sid]

I dont think you can fit a phantom kit on it. The top rail is to close to the barrel and you wouldn't be able to fit a phantom kit over the barrel. Also looks like they shorten and removed the gas tube on the barrel knuckle piece. With it shorten, the phantom kits wouldn't be able to be attached.