February 10th, 2011, 14:51 | #31 |
formerly Contractor 6-8, CptPinard17eRAM
|
have you ever held a ARES TAR21 ??? those feel indestructible
__________________
Retired chairsofter |
February 10th, 2011, 14:51 | #32 |
Crackers
|
|
February 10th, 2011, 14:58 | #33 |
February 10th, 2011, 15:09 | #34 |
a.k.a. wingmantank
|
you are right, thats how my type 97b's piston broke under-20 degree, coz they are toys.
__________________
|
February 10th, 2011, 15:12 | #35 |
a.k.a. wingmantank
|
and you think I am not unbiased, aren't you? well, I guess time will prove it.
__________________
|
February 10th, 2011, 15:14 | #36 |
Crackers
|
in the end you are using these toys to shoot at eachother and play soldier. sorry to say but thats it.
@op i'd suggest attending some games and asking to handle some of the guns your looking at. personally i'd go with a tavor, l85, or type97 because of the armalite mags and interchangeability, also pouches are easy so are vests. |
February 10th, 2011, 15:17 | #37 |
Najohn
|
Opinions are opinions, lets not ruin this thread kids.
SuperCriollo needs help into the Bullpup family so lets give him what he is asking for. I don't want to see another AR or AK on the field next time I play with him |
February 10th, 2011, 15:20 | #38 |
Crackers
|
well as i said it pretty much boils down to personal preferance, the l85 in my opinion was ass heavy but comfortable and pointable. the tavor was solid and light but the irons are crap and mag catch is a slight issue though its good for both handed shooters. the 97 is a great solid performer nearly indestructible but i found the mag catch a pain in the arse, the f2000 is nice, but being forced to use G&G mid caps because of the gearbox and body shape put me off.
|
February 10th, 2011, 15:31 | #39 |
a.k.a. wingmantank
|
I've held a Tavor myself, they are beautiful no doubt. however, you wanna get maximum realistic to their real steel model, real sword is certainly superior. The lower, upper,trigger group,front sight group and stock are interchangeable with their real steel model, not modification needed.`
__________________
|
February 10th, 2011, 15:49 | #40 |
The weight is nice too
__________________
Proud Member of the Strelok society Whoa guy with the thumb rings, save some pussy for the rest of us Welcome to Bed Bath and Beyoncé, if you find anything you like, put a ring on it. What idiot called them Black Bears instead of African Abearicans |
|
February 10th, 2011, 16:03 | #41 |
I take it you came to this conclusion because you fired both the real steel versions?
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it - Aristotle -Founder of Steel City Hamilton Infantry and Tactics -Certified level 43 Autosniper by Commander Amos |
|
February 10th, 2011, 16:12 | #42 |
Not sure if anyone's posted this, But it might help you decide.
Also, it's pretty funny at points. YouTube - Redwolf Airsoft - Battle of the Bullpups - part 1 |
|
February 10th, 2011, 16:17 | #43 |
a.k.a. wingmantank
|
not by me, but my friends.
This was taken when they are testing the RIS system for type95/97. in the first pic, its a RS TYPE 97 lower on a real steel type95, 2nd pic is a RS type 97 with a real steel type 95 lower, on the right. the upper and other parts are interchangeable as he told me.
__________________
|
February 10th, 2011, 16:56 | #44 | |
Najohn
|
Quote:
on a note about the M4 mags for any bullpups, with a modification the the magazine, virtually any mag will work for the F2000, Tavor, 97, etc. |
|
February 10th, 2011, 17:46 | #45 | |
formerly Contractor 6-8, CptPinard17eRAM
|
Quote:
problem is...when you buy a new gun you don't want to mod mags...thats just a pain in the ass
__________________
Retired chairsofter |
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|