December 14th, 2009, 18:44 | #46 | |
Quote:
The comparison I was making was determining if an outdoor gun will be good because it can get tight grouping at 40 feet lol If I had a Bipod and a stable shooting platform it would be a better test ("1337" upgraded rifle v.s. upgraded rifle in desperate need of maintenance), but I don't use those things when I'm using my rifle... small trees and branches are my Bipod and my shooting platform lol Last edited by Amos; December 14th, 2009 at 18:50.. |
||
December 14th, 2009, 18:49 | #47 |
Official ASC Bladesmith
|
Ya, I know, just added my $0.02 worth anyways. My rifles tend to shoot pretty tight groups at 30ft often, but there are still occasional flyers. But I can't and won't ever say I can get consistant headshots at 200ft. 100-150ft, sure, as long as I know the drop amount of the round I'm using, and the conditions aren't too nasty. But indoors, even at short ranges, is a great way to check the consistancy of a gun, and also to set one's scope.
|
December 14th, 2009, 20:02 | #48 |
December 14th, 2009, 22:52 | #49 |
Greetings everyone.
With regards to the topic "Systema vs Guarder Clear", I personally would recommend the Systema over the Guarder clear bucking because of its softness and durability. Most of us here use the Systema soft type bucking with setups reaching up to 530 fps without having problems. Guarder clear on the other hand is a nice bucking but durability wise, it cannot compare to a Systema. A common mistake I always encounter at forums is using a hard type bucking used for setups with only 400 fps and in reality, hard type buckings should be used for over 500+ fps setups. So that everyone may know, hard type buckings are only good for its air sealing capability since the lip of the bucking doesn't expand that much compared to the soft type buckings. With regards to accuracy tests, 30 feet is irrelevant since it is too near and the hop-up has no effect at that range. I would suggest that tests should be done starting at 50 feet and up. I have lots of accuracy test videos at youtube under the name of rickybh and most of them were done using stock barrels, stock bucking, stock internals and only an SCS is installed. If you have any questions, please visit my site at http://shredderscs.proboards.com/index.cgi? or probably a stickied thread pertaining to hop-up problems here at ASC. Thanks very much and Happy Holidays! Ricky |
|
December 14th, 2009, 23:17 | #50 |
Most of the AEG set-ups in Canada are limited to 400 FPS if you're firing full auto -- For Canadian application, I find that the guarder clear is superior to the systema (My own personal testing) But -- To each their own.
|
|
December 14th, 2009, 23:28 | #51 |
400 fps is quite ok already. Our setups here go way beyond 500+ and full-auto can be used which is very very painful.
Regarding the bucking, I was basing my answer based on my personal experiences and from all the inputs that were provided to me as well as posts coming from forums all around. The more inputs we gather, the better. |
|
December 14th, 2009, 23:34 | #52 |
December 14th, 2009, 23:38 | #53 |
December 14th, 2009, 23:40 | #54 |
Depends on what? :P
If it means anything, it will be Full PDI internals Firing at around 450 FPS. |
|
December 14th, 2009, 23:47 | #55 |
If you play CQB, zero the scope at 50-75 feet or 100 feet up if you play on the field.
What do you mean by Full PDI internals? |
|
December 14th, 2009, 23:52 | #56 |
Ah, alright. As in Hop-up, Barrel, Cylinder Set, Trigger. Everything internal will be PDI.
|
|
December 14th, 2009, 23:56 | #57 |
For VSR's PDI parts are nice but the PDI hop chamber doesn't provide good results considering that it uses a rubber "noodle" like nub inside.
|
|
December 14th, 2009, 23:58 | #58 |
Thats why you buy an SCS.
|
|
December 15th, 2009, 00:01 | #59 |
Delierious Designer of Dastardly Detonations
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: in the dark recesses of some metal chip filled machine shop
|
TM stock vinyl hop ups are the most consistent performing hop ups hands down. I find that SystemAs are a moderate second. Both are vinyl based parts (I think it's vinyl anyways, it's definitely not silicone) and appear to be compatible with silicone oils.
Guarder clear and black hop up sleeves are silicone rubber which exhibits nearly the worst abrasion resistance of commercially available elastomers. Silicone rubber is also not compatible with silicone oils because they absorb silicone oils and bloat. They also become softer and even more prone to abrasion. Guarder black sleeves used to be vinyl based so they were my aftermarket go to favorite, but some years ago, they switched to silicone so I dropped them from my inventory (ASCA days). I do find that SystemA and TM sleeves are not very tolerant to many other makes of hop up assemblies. I try to use SystemA or TM sleeves only with TM or SystemA hop up assemblies because other aftermarket makers haven't really gotten around to checking their calipers against gauge blocks.
__________________
Want nearly free GBB gas? |
December 15th, 2009, 00:13 | #60 | ||
Quote:
Quote:
For Panther, I'd say 150~200feet, do it on the field every game. Wind/humidity, etc etc can vary the trajectory slightly on different days. |
|||
|
Bookmarks |
|
|