|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
November 18th, 2011, 13:11 | #16 |
Just wanting some information as well... as I have been upgrading my WE m4 too... not trying to highjack... just looking for similar info
In regards to #3) Would you recommend this over a nineball VSR bucking? Would it be beneficial to get both and use the additional nozzle port piece as well as the 9ball? #4) I have been searching for a inner barrel for quite some time... I dont have my mind set on anything yet but, I have been looking at the RA tech found here...http://www.airsoftparts.ca/store2/in...oducts_id=2206 As you said we can use a VSR inner barrel... does that mean that PDI products are an option? Some Falcon barrels say that they would work for WE M4 systems... but it looks as though the part that goes in the hopup/hopupchamber would be an issue as it's similar to closed bolt inner barrels... any comments on this? Last edited by eKirts; November 18th, 2011 at 13:27.. Reason: editing :) |
|
November 18th, 2011, 16:02 | #17 | |
Quote:
|
||
November 18th, 2011, 19:41 | #18 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
As for the bucking, I have the Firefly Bucking, and the Nine-Ball. The Firefly bucking's giving a TON better seal than the stock bucking, we're talking 1.85J with the stock bucking and 2.65 with the Firefly, I don't think the Firefly has much contact though, as it doesn't give the best hop. Haven't been able to test the Nine-Ball much yet, but I'm better possibly better seal, and appears to have decent hop, I believe it's probably your best bet. As for the mags, the VN style mags are much more reliable and efficient than the standard WE M4 mags, which use a really crappy system, they'll give you more FPS, too. Fox. |
|
November 18th, 2011, 20:25 | #19 |
so lets say this one for example:
Falcon 6.03 for WE GBB RA-tech 6.01 for WE OPEN BOLT looking at the modifications to the barrel... the Falcon looks like its for a closed bolt system.... or am I wrong? |
|
November 18th, 2011, 22:04 | #20 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
http://shop.ehobbyasia.com/falcon-6-03-precision-inner-barrel-for-we-g39c-330mm.html That's just one of 'em, just search around, I remember there were longer and shorter ones. Fox. |
|
November 18th, 2011, 23:08 | #21 |
alrighty; thanks for your help Fox... much appreciated...
I think I may get a falcon and cut/crown it to length |
|
November 19th, 2011, 01:16 | #22 |
November 26th, 2011, 20:21 | #23 |
Ok, now that i have my 416. It is upgrade time.
I did few shoot outdoor at +10c, and i am realy not impressed of the performance, I will try Co2 mags this week but i have no expectation from this too. I will definitely go to HPA. I realy don't care about the tank as this rifle is for plinking. now i need your help for the following item that i want to upgrade. Also if you have part no. that i need to order, and a good place that have these in stock. Again, my goal is to get an accurate rifle, i'm not sure what BBs i will use but for sure .30g maybe more if possible. Hop up, i having hard time with it. If i turn the screw clockwise and then turn back, the rubber will not go back until i desassemble it. now i will try to fix this by myself. If you have any option, i will take them. Tight bore, can i use eag? what is the best to get. Npas (alredy ordered) Nozzle (do i need to replace the nozzle for a metal version?) i will aslo replace all internal with CNC parts during the winter. Magic pin ordered too but this will not affect performance i guess Thanks Dom |
|
December 15th, 2011, 21:51 | #24 |
Ok now, here is where i am with my project, and as mentionned before it is for plinking only.
Upgrade i have on my WE 4168 open bolt RA-TECH 380mm 6.01 tight bore RA-TECH hop-up rubber RA-TECH npas Other up-grade(not affecting performance) RA-TECH magic Pin Magpul RSA sling mount ASP Sling Attachement Magpul MOE trigger Guard ZX T1 red/green dot w/riser shock proof Magpul PTS AFG angle grip Magpul MS2 sling After these installed here is were i am with C02 mag and .28 Armyst BB. Temperature for test +15c (shooting from inside). I do not know the FPS but npas is adjust to the maximum. Not satisfied at all. Then i decide to go HPA After few modification i am now temporarly hooked to a nitrogene tank in my garage with a remote hose(paintball stuff) with a regulator to make my test. The result is a huge difference, i have no more bbs going everywere. THE TEST C02 mag, +15c, 30 round shoot 60 feet distance = 25'' grouping ------------------------------------------------------ HPA, +5c, 30 round shoot 150psi, 50 feet distance .28 armyst = 5.5'' grouping .25 BBbastard = 10'' grouping 150psi, 85 feet distance .28 armyst = 11'' grouping .25 BBbastard = 18'' grouping Now with 10 shoot .28 armyst at different pressure at 50 feet. 125 psi = 3.5'' grouping 140 psi = 4.5'' grouping 165 psi = 3.5'' grouping I have noticed a lot more recoil at 125 psi, and almost nothing at 165 psi. Maybe due to energie transfer that is different at different pressure. Also the rate of fire increase with pressure. I will probably not go over 150psi as i think it can damage the gun???? Now i will order different bbs to continue the project. Aluminium or cilica .30g .40g don't know witch one yet and maybe i will try .30 bio. If anybody have any suggestion to get this gun even more accurate you are welcome. Thanks |
|
December 15th, 2011, 21:53 | #25 |
Just to remind that my goal is to hit a 3 inches target at 100 feet, Maybe impossible but i'll try.
Thanks again. Will post picture soon |
|
December 15th, 2011, 21:56 | #26 | |
Suburban Gun Runner
|
I suggest you get rid of the craptacular bbs to achieve that goal.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
December 15th, 2011, 22:11 | #27 |
i do understand, but it is just to see how accurate i can go with a gbbr, I have many real firearm for the real thing, and soon a Robinson XCR .223 but all of these are not for backyard uses....
It is for my pleasure... |
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|