|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
November 14th, 2012, 11:43 | #16 |
"bb bukakke" KING!
|
well you can get AEGs that make you giggle...
Anything with super fast trigger response and spin up plus 30+ rounds a second tends to make someone giggle... and opfor run like hell. |
November 14th, 2012, 11:56 | #17 |
I'd like to add my voice to the "GBBR just feel better" brigade. I spent a lot of time (and money :P) upgrading AEGs for two years before trying a GBBR once and immediately being converted.
I had upgraded my ICS m4 to try to decrease the delay between pulling the trigger and the shot leaving the barrel, and it was as fast as anything else I'd heard including Systema PTWs that I encountered but as an overall shooting experience the GBBR was just plain better. I would say though that I was always a more effective player with my AEG that with my GBBR. I could carry three times the ammunition in my midcaps than I could in my GBBR mags. Airsoft isn't the most accurate projectile system and so by laws of averages the more aimed rounds I put downrange the more likely I was to hit the target. With an AEG I could triple-tap where I would single or double-tap without worrying about ammo. |
|
November 14th, 2012, 11:57 | #18 |
Haha, Agreed! Yeah having an AEG that basically emits a low note when firing make smiles.
|
|
November 14th, 2012, 12:13 | #19 |
8=======D
|
Let me add.. that is also depends on where and how you play..
I am typically operating in a Close quarters Battle situation.. where .. accuracy at range is not much of a factor.. but trigger response is critical.. as the fraction of a second delay in an AEG ( typical) can be the difference between shooting and being shot. even in the field .. I am more often than not only required to deploy my weapon for self defense as I am often operating in a command role. I tend to run compact carbines, or PDWs .. Short sharp engagements at close range is where I tend to end up fighting. For this.. the GBBR expresses no liabilities and all of the advantages. I keep a couple AEGs in my rack as well generally for cold weather use and for those rare situations where I may need sustained fire capabilities. If I could only afford to keep one gun around.. I admit it would probably be an AEG.
__________________
Brian McIlmoyle TTAC3 Director CAPS Range Officer Toronto Downtown Age Verifier OPERATION WOODSMAN If the tongue could cut as the sword does, the dead would be infinite |
November 14th, 2012, 18:32 | #20 | |
Quote:
Harsh winter game (-20 or below): Polar Star or Daytonagun system w/ HPA Mild winter game (-10 to 10) AEG Playing with Hi-Cappers and ridiculous ROF: AEG CQB game: GBBR Realism: GBBR Milsim: AEG/GBBR I think the first generation of GBBR gave people too much bad impression ie: -Super pricy (you have to dump 1-2k just in the gun itself for internal) -Super pricy magazine ($50-100 per magazine) -Super unreliable (you are expecting a part to break in a game) -Gas inefficienct (you can't empty the gun's magazine with 1 gas load without suffering cool down) Last edited by kullwarrior; November 14th, 2012 at 18:34.. |
||
November 15th, 2012, 12:11 | #21 |
Aw come on horses for courses.
CQB with realistic ROF and magazine capacity is one kind of game and CQB with high ROF, hi-cap, low fps is a whole different game but also fun. That's my experience anyway, having played both and a lot of things in between. side note: My wallet would rather blat away at 30 rps with bbs rather than paintballs. |
|
November 15th, 2012, 17:13 | #22 |
Thank you guys for your replies. It was very interesting to read and as a conclusion I think the safe bet will be to purchase middle priced AEG and see how it goes
|
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|