|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
| Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
March 11th, 2015, 14:04
|
#1 |
|
1x32 ACOG vs a red dot?
Do you find the 1x32 ACOG restricting in view vs a red dot?
__________________
"I Will Gouge Your Eyeball's And Skull F*ck You" |
|
|
|
|
March 11th, 2015, 14:10
|
#2 |
|
Yes.
At 1x magnification I'd prefer a red dot all the way. But if you want the ACOG for looks, have at it. Last edited by brock0; March 11th, 2015 at 14:12.. |
|
|
|
|
March 11th, 2015, 14:26
|
#3 |
|
An acog without magnification would be like an aimpoint m2 with a longer, thinner tube. Unless you really like the look of an acog, and don't want magnification like a real one, there's no good reason to buy one
|
|
|
|
|
March 11th, 2015, 15:24
|
#4 |
|
1x32 ACOG vs a red dot?
I'm learning that now. Just got an ACOG from ASC's classifieds. As much as I like it, the only reason I'd keep it is the illuminated green/red crosshairs are über sharp and clear. The range of view is more restricted than my old 40mm dot scope.
Twice now I've hemmed and hawed over a 1-4x Specter DR. Lesson finally learned.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
March 11th, 2015, 15:45
|
#5 |
|
For me it depends. For CQB (up to 80') a red dot... for longer ranges (but not so long to require any magnification) an acog as I find it's easier to get on target with a circle reticule than just a dot.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
| Bookmarks |
|
|
 |
