|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
March 27th, 2008, 19:11 | #16 |
The reviews I read seems to indicate that it doesn't have the feeding issues that the KJW P226 has.
|
|
March 27th, 2008, 19:22 | #17 |
NAAZ's #1 fan!
|
I own the *deap breath* tm hi-capa 5.1, 4.3, 1911 & detonics. All of them shoot better than my 3 WA 2 kjw and one ksc pistols.
I have a 6.03 on ONE of them. Hands down, TM is the best gbb's available. Metal kits are available for all of them so whats wrong with TM? |
March 27th, 2008, 20:04 | #18 |
Ministry of Peace
|
Crunch perhaps you were unfortunate in that you got a lemon. It does happen from time to time even with high grade makes.
However I agree w/ Saint's comments regarding TM. For the longest time, all you could get was a TM AEG. Now that there are dozens of brands, TM has taken on this mystical reputation as the "gold standard". I'd say they have been far surpassed a long time ago. I used to recommend TM AEGs over other brands for friends getting into the sport, now however these days I am more inclined to tell them "get a CA whatever, find a TM piston assembly on the boards, give me a beer and I'll make you the best damned AEG around"... TM historically was never highly regarded for their GBB/NBB (okay, except for the MK23) pistols - WA was the standard when it came to "the sexyness factor" and KSC was the standard for a gameable pistol. However with their P226, Hicapa and 1911 releases they have won legions of players. I myself ran a KSC G19, and then switched when I started to hear so many good things about the TM P226 from reliable sources in my local community. Of course, looking @ hattrick's post, I have to qualify the above statements w/ the fact that because our community is so small compared to others, it's more likely you will hear a higher percentage of negative comments about a particular model than positive. Particularly w/ the milsim crowd... You don't get a milsim airsoft player coming onto these boards raving about there P226 that has lasted 2,000 rounds stock on propane; it's just not a big deal ie; "So you mean it fires every single time I pull the trigger, no stoppages or blown slides? Good enough for me..." |
March 27th, 2008, 20:24 | #19 |
Kokanee you took the words right out of my mouth. Amen to that. couldn't have said it any better.
it seems that most are only concerned about the build materials of TM stuff--ABS plastic. They hold up just fine, you don't necessarily need metal for your gun to work, Heck your metal gun might even be a bitch to lug around all day. TM probably uses the best plastics in their guns and it shows in the quality. the TM P226 stainless is just pure sex. |
|
March 27th, 2008, 21:07 | #20 |
Formerly Muffinman
|
To clairify: The Airsoft Gun Kai (ASGK, the group of Japanese Airsoft Manufacturers) signed on to ratify that NONE (repeat NONE) of the airsoft handguns manufactured can fire a live round. That means that every gun with ASGK stock (not meaning aftermarket) will come with an ABS frame, Slide and Barrel. This came after the fear that the yakuza were going to modify airsoft and pellet guns to fire real rounds as zip guns.
Not the same with AEG's as KSC, TM etc. have metal bodied AEG's. I'm gonna have to kick the dead horse once again and just say that my TM P226 has worked pretty much non stop for two and a half years, stock with propane with only two severe failures. Most certainly, I've had to replace parts which have worn down, most recently the recoil rod, loading nozzle and trigger spring, but it's still one of the damningest example of a good handgun that I can provide.
__________________
|
March 27th, 2008, 21:14 | #21 | |
Quote:
__________________
"The Bird of Hermes is My Name, Eating My Wings to Make Me Tame." |
||
March 27th, 2008, 21:18 | #22 |
It's possible that I did get a lemon with my M4. Its internals are shit if you ask me. I compare the TM gears and mechbox to my CA gears and mechbox, and there's a world of difference in quality. IMO, they're not even comparable. As far as people saying CA internals are bad, I switched the whole compression system in my CA in the last couple of weeks with new Systema parts, and really the only wear I had was to the tappet plate. I don't see anything bad there at all, really... The TM box though - I got new gears installed, and the mechbox cracked 200 rounds later. Not impressed at all, especially considering how many BBs my "cheap Chinasoft" JG guns have seen and still running strong totally stock.
As for the P226, I'm still wishing I had just gotten the KJW like I had originally considered, but was talked into TM by others who convinced me they were leaps and bounds ahead of all others. It's got its ussues right now upgraded and really not performing up to par (260 fps tops, and a gas hog and can barely get 1 full mag per propane fill).
__________________
|
|
March 27th, 2008, 21:37 | #23 |
My TM P226 had that issue with the slide not locking back after the last BB was fired. I fixed it and now it works properly.
It fired 280fps stock with propane, and now 310fps with a twist barrel and Nine ball hop-up bucking. I like my TM AUG except for the barrel assembly which doesn't lock solidly on the receiver. It always wobbles a bit, nothing major, but it's still annoying. My only real regret with TM was to buy a M4A1. Nobody should buy a TM M4/M16 with so many better options out there. Now I know. At least, I modified my M4A1 into a S-System and now it's pretty decent. Last edited by Omi-san; March 27th, 2008 at 21:40.. |
|
March 27th, 2008, 21:49 | #24 |
Another thing that concerns me is the lack of a "real" safety. The real steel P226 doesn't have a safety on it, but the Marui has a somewhat safety, which doesn't actually completly lock the gun from firing, but just makes the trigger pull harder, or so it appears. I highly doubt a gun would go off in a holster during a game, but it's good to know that your gun has a safety..
|
|
March 27th, 2008, 21:55 | #25 |
The TM 226 safety completely blocks from firing. It doesn't just make pulling the trigger harder. If that's what your gun does, then there's something wrong with it.
And with the strong double action trigger on the P226, there's no need for a safety. If it's decocked, you can't set that thing off except if you deliberately pull the trigger. And the idea is to be able to draw your pistol, disengage the safety, and fire ASAP. Unless you're left-handed, that's impossible to do with the 226 if the safety is on. And even for a left-handed shooter, that's awkward.
__________________
|
|
March 27th, 2008, 22:22 | #26 |
What? I read in a review that if you pull the trigger hard enough, the gun still fires.
|
|
March 27th, 2008, 22:55 | #27 |
Holding mine right now with the safety on and I'm pulling the trigger pretty hard (probably harder than I ever should). It's not firing.
__________________
|
|
March 27th, 2008, 23:01 | #28 |
My KJW also refuses to fire with the safety engaged. You can pull the trigger and the hammer also follows, but it stops dead partway back.
__________________
"The Bird of Hermes is My Name, Eating My Wings to Make Me Tame." |
|
March 27th, 2008, 23:09 | #29 |
Same on the TM. you can pull the trigger back maybe 1/5 of its travel with the hammer following. Then it stops dead.
__________________
|
|
March 27th, 2008, 23:25 | #30 | |
Quote:
Hmm I just tried the TM-safety dealie, and it actually works on my KJW P229. Never knew that before. Not like I'll actually use it thought. Double action trigger is enough. |
||
|
Bookmarks |
|
|